Dear Readers,
My good luck came to an end last weekend, the weather suddenly turning bad. From 80 degree temps 2
weekends ago it was rain and temps in the mid 30's Friday night, and snow Saturday night. That kept
me from going to Oktoberfest's 2nd weekend, although I went out later on Friday night and got 1
sighting. Saturday night's snow kept me home.
The one late Friday night sighting gives me 15 for September, along with 3 new shots, bettering my
monthly averages with one more weekend left.
The weather is supposed to be seasonal (night temps in the 40's), so maybe I can break that
September record of (only) 16 next weekend.
This week's lone sighting, and other news:
Friday was a steady drizzle of rain all day and night, which kept the ground wet and severely
reduced my shooting possibilities. Wet, dark pavement muzzles camera flash unless I'm standing right
next to a lady, as the ground becomes so dark the flash can't light anything on it from more than a
couple of feet away. The crowd was noticeably smaller, falling rain definitely keeps people away
much more than cold temperatures do. But I quickly noticed men were peeing everywhere (I saw close
to 20 men), which usually means I'll see some ladies too, but I only saw one, even I understand why
a lady wouldn't want to expose her butt to pee outside in this kind of weather:
Friday, 1:55 a.m.- I was walking by the big active parking lot (my favorite place this year), and
walking through it saw a guy in his late 20's standing in front of a dumpster behind a building. He
was facing the alley, he had to be covering someone. About 5 seconds later a tall slim blonde stands
up behind him, where she had squatted by the side of the dumpster, and quickly pulls up her tight
black pants. They walk to their car in the lot, about 30 feet away in the row by the alley. She had
peed on some weeds growing there between a crack in the pavement, and this is why I hate the ground
being wet so much - there is no 'evidence' left behind, no puddle to see!
Just before this happened another lady at a car in the lot left it and went back to the alley. She
walked around looking at various places before coming back into the lot and going to her car,
telling her waiting boyfriend, "I couldn't do it back there!"
Other tidbits: I read about a controversy involving actress Farah Fawcett last week.
An angry Farah told the New York Daily News that she is outraged at author Joe Eszterhas, for what
he wrote about her in his new book, titled American Rhapsody. "I'd like to slap him!", she
said.
What did he write? Eszterhas, a former writer for Rolling Stone magazine, wrote that while at a
swanky Hollywood party, "Farah relieved herself on the front lawn." Said an angry Farah:
"I'm so upset! I'm shy. I mean, I can go on a trip for days and not go because I won't sit on a
toilet seat on a plane. I'm certainly not going to go on somebody's lawn. Could you imagine, in a
cocktail dress?"
Yes Farah, I certainly could! Of course I had to check out this controversy for myself, so I went to
a bookstore here and found the book and looked through it. There it was, on page 45: "At a
Hollywood party Farah, finding the bathrooms full, went out on the lawn and pooped"...
Pooped? You mean she didn't pee, she took a shit in the yard? Well, that IS a little hard to
believe! But I'll say if it's true, she probably peed too.
Who ever takes a shit without peeing?
The book is pretty much like listening to conversation you'd hear men saying in a locker room or
while drinking beers in a bar. Eszterhas has a fascination with the movers and shakers in both
Hollywood and Washington D.C., and their sexual behavior. There's a lot of stuff about President
Clinton and the Lewinsky scandal, Senator Bob Packwood and his trysts with female aides, and the
sexual fetishes of Vernon Jordan and other powerful D.C. people and prominent Hollywood people. If
such things interest you, you'd enjoy the book.
Interesting: Remember the 4 newest shots I reviewed a few weeks ago? I said they were
printed light and were washed-out looking, but streams were visible in 2 of the 4 shots. Well, I got
my extra prints of them back from my custom lab Saturday, and as I expected the shots were printed
darker and look much better - more like what I actually saw when I snapped the ladies. The distant
shot of the pretty Hispanic lady squatted by the dumpster who enjoyed me snapping her looks much
better, I can enjoy her pretty face and big smile now. But amazingly, the visible streams in the 2
shots where they showed are harder to see in the correctly printed shots! That surprises me, I guess
underexposing shots - at the expense of not bringing out detail in the rest of the shot - is the way
to best expose a stream of pee flowing from a lady. Is a lady's stream more important than the rest
of the shot, in these instances, or is a more pleasing overall shot where the stream might not show
more important? Tough question, but I like the better overall shots the most because a lot of the
appeal to me is the details of the lady and where she's peeing - the biggest difference between my
work and the typical pee-porn out there on this subject!
Click HERE for your FREE watersports pic of the day
www.desperatewomen.com Back to PeeSightings MenuWet
Sex Shop | Cascade Mags | Watersports
for Women | Message Board
Pissing
Stories | Fetish Contacts | Watersports
Books | Live 121
Special
Offer | Videos with Pissing Content