Dear Readers,
Another cold weekend with no sightings, although I did get
out late for awhile on Saturday night. Evening snow kept me in on Friday
night, it was sunny on Saturday and not as cold, so I decided to go to the
sightings area that night. It was cold but bearable (mid 20's), most streets
clear but parking lots ice-covered in some or most of them. The crowd
was much bigger than I expected, lots about 70% full. I was once again
treated to the amazing sight of ladies in miniskirts and other tight and
skimpy clothes with no coats walking around, the way they act when
they're cold is a lot like when they have to pee so they're enjoyable to
watch. As usual a lot of men peed, and I walked over to the just-closed
dance club. It was locked up, signs in the window listing auction dates
and the furniture and music equipment inside available for bidding. The
parking lot across the street was about 70% full, which surprised me
although it shouldn't have. People going to the bars on the next couple
of blocks were parking here now, which means there will continue to be
peeing in this lot. It doesn't look like the closing of this dance club will
hurt traffic in this part of the area as much as I thought it
would.
I've been getting more e-mails from guy lately wanting to know
about my sightings techniques and camera equipment, so I will give some info
on those things here. I'll use this just-closed dance club as an example,
as I was going through my work last week to see what it's produced over
the years.
******************
The first bar opened in this space in '93,
before much of the other development that is here now started. I didn't
start coming to this part of the sightings area regularly until '95, when
the new bars started opening there and people started migrating from the
other part of the sightings area some 6 blocks south, where I started having
sightings in '92. I had taken 58 pictures by '95, all but about 3 from this
part of the area. 63 of my 164 shots are from this part of the area, but I
haven't taken one there since a Thursday night street concert on August 6
'98 (Desp 110 in album 4) as the mix of night life there has changed to
eliminate the clubs that drew the 20-something party-girl types with weak
bladders.
My first shot of a lady from this just-closed club
came shortly after I started going to that area, one of my first sightings
there. She left the club and ran across the street in front of me into
the parking lot, unbuckling the belt on her jeans. I followed and got the
easy back shot of her squatted by her car peeing (4-14-95, Desp 59 in album
3). I would snap 4 other ladies coming from this club that year, 5 more in
'96, 2 each in '97 and '99, and 1 this year for a total of 15. Among those
shots is Desp 139 (in the sample album at my website), the lady who peed in
her pants on the sidewalk - this was the club she had been in. There are
also 4 more shots of ladies I got peeing in the parking lot across the
street from this club, who came from other nearby clubs - 2 each in '97 and
'98. 3 of those shots had 2 ladies peeing together in them.
That's a
total of 19 pictures, 15 from the club - but how many sightings? I average
about 1 picture every 8 sightings, so about 120 sightings from that club
since '95 - seems about right, from what I remember. The club's ladies
produced an average of 24 sightings a year for me - not the biggest
producer, but one of the places that added to my yearly totals.
When
I look at my pictures, I remember what bars (or block of bars) the ladies
came from. This is the biggest benefit of my walking around where the ladies
are, instead of sitting in a car somewhere waiting for ladies to come there
and pee. I like to know where the places are these ladies are coming from,
where they are not using the bathroom and coming out into the streets with
full bladders. There are definite patterns to that, which if you become
familiar with (where you are) you can look forward to lots of sightings
success.
Camera news:My new camera broke Saturday night! I had just
gotten back to my car to leave, and decided to check the camera's operation
to see if it had gotten too cold to work properly. I turned it on and zoomed
out the lens to it's maximum (145 mm), and it made a funny noise as it
zoomed out.I zoomed it back in, and just as the lens got back to 38 mm there
was a snapping noise as something broke. The lens didn't completely close,
and "E 1" appeared in the camera's LCD window. It doesn't work at all now,
even when I turn it on. This camera is only 17 months old, I've taken the
last 41 of my 'P' shots with it. It's just beyond it's one-year warranty,
but this was a defective part causing this that I shouldn't have to pay to
get fixed. I've sent Samsung, the camera's manufacturer, an e-mail about
what happened.
I'm prepared though, as I'll go back to using my first
camera which has been repaired by the factory. Although it's lens is shorter
(38 mm to 105 mm compared to 38 mm to 145 mm on the newer camera), it is a
more durable camera with features that make it better suited for the night
shooting I do. It has a brighter flash (6 volts to 3 volts for the newer
camera), lighted LCD panel so I can set the camera to whatever modes I
want before shooting (a godsend on those dark nights!). It's a little
bulkier and heavier than the newer camera, it's zoom mechanism is noisier
but works more smoothly and it's shutter is quicker. I like the lens better,
the images seem bigger than they were in the newer camera's pictures and
it offers a better possibility of making a good shot a stunning one - as it
did many times in some of my early shots. I lose that extra zoom range I had
in the newer camera (105 to 145 mm), but because the newer camera had a
weaker flash I couldn't use that extra range at night because the shots
would be underexposed. I've done a better job getting closer to my ladies
this year (within 12 feet of them), and have shot most of my shots at 70 mm
to 90 mm so I should be fine going back to the 105 mm camera. I've stopped
trying to shoot ladies who are more than 20 or 25 feet away, which is the
distance a 105 mm lens doesn't quite reach adequately at night (the image is
small). I got the 145 mm camera for that situation, but it's weaker flash
negated the benefits. You do get the benefits of the longer lens if shooting
in daylight or good lighting, though.
I'm happy about going back to the
105 mm camera again. I took my first 123 'P' shots with it and didn't want
to throw it away when the shutter mechanism broke after 7 years. It seems to
be working as good as new, we'll see after I've shot that first roll. I like
the idea of having a backup camera, as it keeps me from missing anything
should something go wrong with the camera I'm using. Fortunately this is a
slow time, I could afford a camera malfunction since there aren't really any
shot opportunities I'm missing. We'll see what Samsung is willing to do for
me about this camera, which is too new to spend a lot of money
repairing.
Click HERE for your FREE watersports pic of the day
www.desperatewomen.com Back to PeeSightings Menu
Wet
Sex Shop | Cascade Mags | Watersports
for Women | Message
Board
Pissing Stories Fetish Contacts | Watersports
Books | Live 121
Special
Offer | Videos with Pissing Content