Dear Readers,
Another cold weekend with no sightings, although I did get out late for awhile on Saturday night. Evening snow kept me in on Friday night, it was sunny on Saturday and not as cold, so I decided to go to the sightings area that night. It was cold but bearable (mid 20's), most streets clear but parking lots ice-covered in some or most of them. The crowd was much bigger than I expected, lots about 70% full. I was once again treated to the amazing sight of ladies in miniskirts and other tight and skimpy clothes with no coats walking around, the way they act when they're cold is a lot like when they have to pee so they're enjoyable to watch. As usual a lot of men peed, and I walked over to the just-closed dance club. It was locked up, signs in the window listing auction dates and the furniture and music equipment inside available for bidding. The parking lot across the street was about 70% full, which surprised me although it shouldn't have. People going to the bars on the next couple of blocks were parking here now, which means there will continue to be peeing in this lot. It doesn't look like the closing of this dance club will hurt traffic in this part of the area as much as I thought it would.
I've been getting more e-mails from guy lately wanting to know about my sightings techniques and camera equipment, so I will give some info on those things here. I'll use this just-closed dance club as an example, as I was going through my work last week to see what it's produced over the years.
******************
The first bar opened in this space in '93, before much of the other development that is here now started. I didn't start coming to this part of the sightings area regularly until '95, when the new bars started opening there and people started migrating from the other part of the sightings area some 6 blocks south, where I started having sightings in '92. I had taken 58 pictures by '95, all but about 3 from this part of the area. 63 of my 164 shots are from this part of the area, but I haven't taken one there since a Thursday night street concert on August  6 '98 (Desp 110 in album 4) as the mix of night life there has changed to eliminate the clubs that drew the 20-something party-girl types with weak bladders.
My first shot of a lady from this just-closed club came shortly after I started going to that area, one of my first sightings there. She left the club and ran across the street in front of me into the parking lot, unbuckling the belt on her jeans. I followed and got the easy back shot of her squatted by her car peeing (4-14-95, Desp 59 in album 3). I would snap 4 other ladies coming from this club that year, 5 more in '96, 2 each in '97 and '99, and 1 this year for a total of 15. Among those shots is Desp 139 (in the sample album at my website), the lady who peed in her pants on the sidewalk - this was the club she had been in. There are also 4 more shots of ladies I got peeing in the parking lot across the street from this club, who came from other nearby clubs - 2 each in '97 and '98. 3 of those shots had 2 ladies peeing together in them.
That's a total of 19 pictures, 15 from the club - but how many sightings? I average about 1 picture every 8 sightings, so about 120 sightings from that club since '95 - seems about right, from what I remember. The club's ladies produced an average of 24 sightings a year for me - not the biggest producer, but one of the places that added to my yearly totals.
When I look at my pictures, I remember what bars (or block of bars) the ladies came from. This is the biggest benefit of my walking around where the ladies are, instead of sitting in a car somewhere waiting for ladies to come there and pee. I like to know where the places are these ladies are coming from, where they are not using the bathroom and coming out into the streets with full bladders. There are definite patterns to that, which if you become familiar with (where you are) you can look forward to lots of sightings success.
Camera news:My new camera broke Saturday night! I had just gotten back to my car to leave, and decided to check the camera's operation to see if it had gotten too cold to work properly. I turned it on and zoomed out the lens to it's maximum (145 mm), and it made a funny noise as it zoomed out.I zoomed it back in, and just as the lens got back to 38 mm there was a snapping noise as something broke. The lens didn't completely close, and "E 1" appeared in the camera's LCD window. It doesn't work at all now, even when I turn it on. This camera is only 17 months old, I've taken the last 41 of my 'P' shots with it. It's just beyond it's one-year warranty, but this was a defective part causing this that I shouldn't have to pay to get fixed. I've sent Samsung, the camera's manufacturer, an e-mail about what happened.
I'm prepared though, as I'll go back to using my first camera which has been repaired by the factory. Although it's lens is shorter (38 mm to 105 mm compared to 38 mm to 145 mm on the newer camera), it is a more durable camera with features that make it better suited for the night shooting I do. It has a brighter flash (6 volts to 3 volts for the newer camera), lighted LCD panel so I can set the camera to whatever modes I want before shooting (a godsend on those dark nights!). It's a little bulkier and heavier than the newer camera, it's zoom mechanism is noisier but works more smoothly and it's shutter is quicker. I like the lens better, the images seem bigger than they were in the newer camera's pictures and it offers a better possibility of making a good shot a stunning one - as it did many times in some of my early shots. I lose that extra zoom range I had in the newer camera (105 to 145 mm), but because the newer camera had a weaker flash I couldn't use that extra range at night because the shots would be underexposed. I've done a better job getting closer to my ladies this year (within 12 feet of them), and have shot most of my shots at 70 mm to 90 mm so I should be fine going back to the 105 mm camera. I've stopped trying to shoot ladies who are more than 20 or 25 feet away, which is the distance a 105 mm lens doesn't quite reach adequately at night (the image is small). I got the 145 mm camera for that situation, but it's weaker flash negated the benefits. You do get the benefits of the longer lens if shooting in daylight or good lighting, though.
I'm happy about going back to the 105 mm camera again. I took my first 123 'P' shots with it and didn't want to throw it away when the shutter mechanism broke after 7 years. It seems to be working as good as new, we'll see after I've shot that first roll. I like the idea of having a backup camera, as it keeps me from missing anything should something go wrong with the camera I'm using. Fortunately this is a slow time, I could afford a camera malfunction since there aren't really any shot opportunities I'm missing. We'll see what Samsung is willing to do for me about this camera, which is too new to spend a lot of money repairing.

Click HERE for your FREE watersports pic of the day

www.desperatewomen.com   Back to PeeSightings Menu

Wet Sex Shop | Cascade Mags | Watersports for Women | Message Board
Pissing Stories   Fetish Contacts | Watersports Books | Live 121
Special Offer |
Videos with Pissing Content