Picture
of a lady peeing outdoors.
Dear Readers,
Finally got my first March pee sighting last Friday night, the only sighting on St.
Patricks' weekend. If it seems like I've been writing a lot less this year it's
because that's true, this is only my 7th sighting of the year and I haven't had
much to write about.
Last year on this date I had 23 sightings already,
including all 3 of my March pee sightings as they came early in the month. Does that
make this year disappointing so far? I would say yes if it weren't for the 2
pissing shots I've snapped already from the 7 sightings, last year I didn't snap my
first picture of a lady peeing outdoors until the year's 70th sighting on July 9. I'm very happy about the 2
shots so early in the year, 1 other year I had 2 shots this early and finished
that year with 26 shots - my last big picture year (2001).
The 7 sightings by
mid-March does tie for my lowest total ever by this date, but I went on to
finish that year with 132 sightings so ladies eventually started peeing. I'm not
worried yet, it's still early in the year with cold nights and small crowds.
Every year is different when it comes to sightings, there are always both good
and bad surprises that you never know are going to happen until they happen. No
ladies ever leave home thinking they're going to be in a desperate situation and
have to pee outside somewhere, which is what makes getting sightings so
fascinating - desperate situations often happen very suddenly, many times to the
unlikeliest of ladies!
I didn't realize until Friday it was St. Patrick's day after seeing ads for lots
of parties going on around town and in my sightings area. The weekend nights
were cold (temps mid 30's), Friday night was the biggest crowd in the sightings
area since New Years' Eve with lots of ladies walking the streets throughout the
area all night, but Saturday night was surprisingly dead. It was disappointing
to get only 1 sighting from Friday night's crowd as I heard several ladies
complaining of needing to pee, I barely got this one:
Saturday, 1:20 a.m.- I was coming from the slow part of the area on my way to
the busy area, about to pass by the RTD station block. I was on the back block
by the administration building, a 20's couple coming from the other end of the
block was walking towards me and turned up the sidewalk by the administration
building towards the pee area. I was pretty far away and hurried over there, as
I got there the lady just stood up and walked out from a back corner of a small
stairway just off the street - another popular pee spot by this building. We
could see each other, did she just pee or was she stopping before doing it
because she saw me? My question was answered by a rapidly-moving thin stream
running down the cracks between the sidewalk blocks to the sidewalk I was about
to pass, she walked out and past me to her waiting boyfriend. She was petite and
thin with short black hair snapping up the front of her jeans, an 'Elvira' face
with lots of eye makeup (gothic look) as she glared at me with a "Yes I just
peed, so what?" look on her face as we passed. Her fresh puddle was in the back
corner of the stairs, an average-sized puddle she had peed over the puddle a guy
made earlier.
This is another popular pee spot by this RTD station, I've never
snapped a shot of a lady here because it's in the open and they either see me
coming and stop or someone is guarding them. Hopefully this will be the year I
get lucky and snap a shot here!
Sightings and ladies' pee spots: I got a report a few days ago from a guy who's been
going out for sightings probably longer than me, he had a productive outing at a
St. Patrick's day event he and some friends went to. He mentioned getting a lot
of parking lot sightings at this event (women peeing between parked cars) and
was pleasantly surprised by the quality of them, writing that parking lot
sightings are not typically his favorites. This got me thinking....
I love parking lot sightings because they provide the best shot opportunities,
which makes my thoughts about them different. Once a lady squats down between
cars she can't see me coming and women are very comfortable peeing in this spot
so they are relaxed natural shots and with the paved lots I see my ladies in I
can see puddles, which add so much to a sighting's appeal. Besides parking lots
I like anyplace where a lady pees that I can approach without her seeing me,
followed by open places where I can see her but can't snap a shot - so shot
potential is what determines my favorite places to see ladies pee. My overall
favorite is seeing ladies pee on something they shouldn't, like a desperate lady
I saw climb into a flower pot and pee next to the plant and the disgruntled
secretary in one of my videoclips who hiked up her skirt and peed in her bosses
chair. My least favorite spots are places where the lady is completely hidden
(like bathrooms!), outdoor spots where she's guarded and spots where her puddle
isn't visible - like grass, dark or wet ground, over a drain or hole in the
ground.
Readers, what are your favorite and least favorite spots to see ladies
pee? MailMe
Finally, I've been spending the winter months learning as much as I can about
digital photography and my camera so I'll be ready to snap great shots with my
digital camera when the warm weather comes and shot opportunities are more
plentiful. I've used my digital camera for about 6 months now, have snapped 3
pee shots with it (1 average, 1 blurry, 1 great) and 3 puddle shots. I've
started printing out some of my shots on my printer with photo paper to see how
that works, as I hear most people don't do that. All the results has made it
clear to me how completely different from 35mm photography digital photography
is, everything from how the cameras work to the images they produce and how they
print. It's really 2 different technologies that you really can't compare,
although it seems like a natural comparison because digital photography is on
it's way to replacing 35mm photography.
A few quick examples:
-The focusing systems are different. Although digicams are made with the same
kind of focusing systems as 35mm cameras, they work differently. 35mm focusing
systems use distance and horizontal /vertical lines in the subject to set focus,
if the lens can't find lines in the subject to focus on you'll get blurry
images. Digicam focusing systems rely more on brightness and contrast in the
subject to set focus, so low-contrast subjects can come out blurry even if
you're close to them - something I had found on some shots that my 35mm camera
has no trouble at all focusing on, including one of my New Years' Eve pee shots.
The fix is to set the brightness and contrast in the camera's LCD display screen
to it's maximum brightness/ contrast setting, the images you see there is what
the camera's lens sees and sets the focus and exposure to. My shots have been
much better since changing that setting, the lens focuses quicker now and the
shutter speed is faster - even in dark or night shots. You can turn off the LCD
display and use the camera's viewfinder, but you lose the quicker focusing and
faster shutter doing that.
Zoom lens and overall image sharpness: Not as good as 35mm shots, particularly
distant objects in the background. This is because of the compressed jpeg format
images are captured and stored in by the camera, which discards some information
(pixels) in the compression process that shows up in background objects - the
biggest difference between digital format and 35mm film, which shows more detail
in distant background subjects. The fix for this? More important to be closer to
your subjects when you shoot.
Printing: this is the biggest difference. If you print directly from the
camera's memory card, you'll notice the pictures don't look the same as they
display on a computer. They tend to print darker with less contrast and in many
cases with the visible pixel dots you see in newspaper pictures - which doesn't
look like a 35mm print. This can be mostly eliminated by increasing the
brightness and contrast in your jpeg image in photo editing software before
printing it, then they'll print bright and look like they do on the computer
screen with little or no visible pixels, smooth like a 35mm print. I use my
photo editing software to print my camera images instead of the camera's
printing software, because it has more extensive brightness and contrast
settings than the camera's printing software that produces a better print. But
even the best printer prints are not the same as 35mm, looking at a printer
print under a magnifying glass you'll see the little pixel dots (RGB,
red/green/blue if color and black/white if black & white) that combine to make
up the image and all the colors in the photo. It's amazing that they can
reproduce images so accurately, 35mm prints aren't reproduced this way. They are
light shined through the film onto paper, the image and color reproduced on the
paper with clear lines and no pixels. That's how photo labs make prints from
35mm film.
2 totally different technologies for producing images that look virtually the
same, amazing!
I'm not sure which way digital prints are printed by photo labs, or those
machines in stores where people can print their own digital prints - but looking
at them with a magnifying glass will tell you which printing technology is used.
Amazing, all the things I've learned over the years to help me enjoy looking at
peeing ladies more! Yes these things are important, because all those little
details in my shots are what makes them so great - like the detailed streams
coming from ladies and the subtle details about their bodies that are revealed
under their panties....
A fitting example is my only St. Patrick's night shot, taken back in 2000 of 2
drunk ladies who really had to pee after leaving a bar. Going to their car in a
parking lot they hiked up their long skirts between theirs and the next car and
peed standing, leaning their butts against the fenders of each car, facing and
beside each other. I got the visible stream of lady 2 in the shot who was behind
lady 1 (lady 1 smiled at me and said "Hi!" while she peed) and clear views of
small lumps of cellulite on the back of the thighs of both ladies - which guys
said they liked because it made the ladies more real! (3-18-00, desp 143 in
album 7). 6 years after snapping this shot, these ladies were just perfect for
everything I wrote about this week!
Click HERE to download X-Streams DVDs
www.desperatewomen.com Back to PeeSightings Menu